AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
15 paragraphs · 280 wordsThe petitioner prays for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.253 dated 21.04.2018, registered under Sections 120-B, 323, 34, 427, 452, 506 IPC at
Police Station Bhiwani Sadar, District Bhiwani.
The operative part of the order dated 11.05.2018, vide which interim anticipatory bail has been granted to the petitioner, is reproduced as under:-
“….Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per allegation in the FIR, it is alleged by the complainant that she is Ex-Sarpanch of the
village and two persons had entered into her house and gave beatings to her son. When she raised hue and cry, neighbours rescued them and intruders
threatened to eliminate her and her husband by stating that the petitioner has given money to them for causing the murder of her husband. It is further
stated in the FIR that the aforesaid two persons were handed over to the police. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner was not
present at the spot and on account of party faction in the village, he has been falsely implicated in this case as presently his daughter-in-law is the
Sarpanch of village.
Notice of motion for 12.09.2018....†Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, in pursuance to the order dated 11.05.2018, the petitioner has
appeared before the Investigating Officer and has joined the investigation.
Counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Ram Gopal, has not disputed the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner is no more required for
further investigation.
In view of the above, this petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 11.05.2018 is made absolute subject to the
conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
