AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
18 paragraphs · 369 wordsHeard Mr. Krishna Deo Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar No.2, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter
referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Rajauli PS Case No. 321 of 2020 dated 16.07.2020, instituted under Sections 30 (a)/41 and 52 of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The petitioner was caught from the place where 60 litres of mahua liquor and 1,000 litres of fragmented mahua was seized by the police.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the FIR itself, recovery was from the distillery of one Dinesh Yadav and not the petitioner
and only because the petitioner was found near the place, he was arrested. Learned counsel submitted that he has no other criminal antecedent and is
in custody since 17.07.2020.
Learned APP submitted that the petitioner was caught from the place from where such recovery has been made.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail
upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional
District Judge-II cum Special Judge Excise, Nawada in Rajauli PS Case No.321 of 2020, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be a
close relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the
petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any illegal/criminal activity, act in violation of any law/statutory
provisions, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to
cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate
or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.
The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.
