AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 401 wordsHeard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the
stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.
In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Torpa P.S. Case No.11 of 2016 (G.R. No. 53 of 2016), S.T. No. 193 of 2017
registered under sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 17 of the CLA Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the
co-accused persons has committed the murder of the brother of the informant namely Susharan Horo. It is further submitted that the allegations
against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because the deceased was found
dancing with the petitioner and the co-accused persons, six days prior to the dead body of the deceased was recovered and the petitioner and the co-
accused persons were pressurizing the deceased to join the PLFI Extremist Organization, hence it is suspected that the petitioner might have
committed the murder of the deceased. It is further submitted that except suspicion, there is no material to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is
next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.09.2020 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 20 of the bail application. It is lastly
submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to
enlarge the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees
Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Khunti, in connection
with Torpa P.S. Case No.11 of 2016 (G.R. No. 53 of 2016), S.T. No. 193 of 2017 with the condition that he will cooperate with the trial of the case.
