AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 234 wordsVinay Saraf, J
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking direction to the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner, whereby the petitioner has claimed the compensation on account of registration of F.I.R. on the basis of complaint lodged by the petitioner under the provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is victim and petitioner has lodged an F.I.R. at Police Station Gorabazar, District Jabalpur which was registered as Crime No.198/2025 under sections 103(1), 115 of BNS and under Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, but the amount of compensation has not been granted to the petitioner as per the provisions of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995. He further submits that petitioner has already submitted a representation before the respondents, but the same has not been decided till now.
Considering the same, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner on 24.12.2025 within a period of 30 days, in accordance with law, by passing a speaking and reasoned order, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and communicate the outcome of the same to the petitioner.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
With the aforesaid, present petition is disposed of.
