High CourtsSingle Bench

Bitu Sah And Ors vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 11 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 PAT CK 0115

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashwani Kumar Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Scheduled Castes And The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(1)(r)(s), 14(A)(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 325, 341, 379, 504, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal (Sj) No. 1869 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

33 paragraphs · 670 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the State via video conferencing.

2.

The instant appeal under Section 14A (2) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been preferred by

the appellants against the order dated 17.06.2020 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-1stâ€"cum-Special Judge, SC/ST,

Saran in Anticipatory Bail Application No.876 of 2020 whereby the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail of the appellants in Daudpur P.S. Case No.57 of

2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 325, 379, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and

Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for short ‘the Act’) has been rejected.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the impugned order is bad in law as well as on facts. There is no truth behind the

allegation made in the first information report that the accused Dipu Kumar Sah and Ravi Sah abused and assaulted the members of the prosecution

party. He further contended that the alleged quarrel had taken place amongst the appellants and the members of the prosecution party while playing

football. The further contention is that there is no allegation of abusing any member of the prosecution party against the appellants except appellant

no.4 Dipu Kumar Sah.

4.

Learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the appeal against the order impugned. She contended that there is

allegation that the appellants abused and assaulted the members of the prosecution party while they were going to play football.

5.

I have heard the parties and perused the materials on record.

6.

Considering that the specific allegation of abuse and assault is confined against appellant no.4 Dipu Kumar Sah and co-accused Ravi Sah, the

impugned order passed by the court below so far as appellant no.4 Dipu Kumar Sah is concerned is upheld. His appeal is dismissed. In case, he

surrenders and seeks bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced in any manner by this order.

7.

So far as appellant nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5 namely, Bitu Sah, Rajan Kumar Prasad @ Rajan Prasad, Deepak Sah @ Deepak Kumar and Bablu Sah

respectively are concerned, since there is no allegation of intentional insult or intimidation with intention to humiliate any member of the scheduled

castes and the scheduled tribes and there is no allegation of even destroying, damaging or defying any object generally known to be sacred or in high

esteem by members of the scheduled castes or the scheduled tribes, their appeal is allowed. The impugned order passed by the court below in their

case is set aside. They are directed to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge,

SC/ST, Saran in connection with Daudpur P.S. Case No.57 of 2020.

8.

The appeal stands allowed partially.

9.

Since the court proceedings are being conducted through virtual mode and normal court functioning has not been restored till date, it is considered

appropriate to adopt the following procedure for communication of the present order:-

(i) The order, which has been dictated during the course of proceeding of the virtual court, shall be communicated to me on my e-mail by the Senior

Secretary.

(ii) The corrected copy of the order shall be transmitted by me from my e-mail id to the Senior Secretary, which shall be treated to be an authentic

copy of the order passed by this Court in the present proceeding.

(iii) Hard copy of the order duly signed by me shall be preserved in my residential office for documentation and future use, if any.

(iv) Let steps be taken by the Senior Secretary/registry for up-loading of the present order without compromising with the norms of social distancing.