High CourtsDivision Bench

(Boddipati) Lalamma and Others vs Emperor

Madras High Court · Decided on 3 February 1927 · Citation: AIR 1928 Mad 197

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wallace, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 105 words

Wallace, J.—In a case where the President of the Bench is in a minority as to conviction or acquittal, the judgment should be written by some member of the majority. Otherwise, as in the present ease, we have a conviction based on an acquitting judgment, and we are left without any reasons for conviction which under the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Bench is bound to set out. The judgment does not conform to the law and the conviction cannot be upheld. It is hereby set aside. The fines, if paid, should be refunded.

2.

It is not a case for ordering retrial.