High CourtsSingle Bench

Brij Mohan Aggarwal vs Ramesh Vimal (Deceased) Thr Lrs

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 January 2020 · Citation: (2020) 01 DEL CK 0116

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
RC.Revision No. 688 Of 2019, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 52696, 52698 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 346 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

1.

Petitioner impugns order dated 30.07.2019, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order

passed.

2.

Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of

Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with regard to private No.1 in property bearing No.1825, Uday Chand Marg, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi, more

particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner under instructions from the petitioner who is present in court seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

4.

Petitioner who is present in Court in person, undertakes that he shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises

to the respondent on or before 30.11.2020. Petitioner further undertakes that petitioner shall pay use and occupation charges at the rate of Rs. 3500/-

per month with effect from 01.02.2020 till the time he hands over the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or

before 30.11.2020.

5.

Petitioner further undertakes that he shall clear all water, electricity and other dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before he vacates

the premises. He further undertakes that he shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the tenanted premises or any part thereof. He

further undertakes that he shall not cause any damage to the tenanted premises and shall hand over the possession of the same in the condition as it

exists today subject to normal wear and tear.

6.

The undertaking is accepted.

7.

Learned counsel for the respondent under instructions from the respondent submits that the undertaking is also acceptable to the respondent.

8.

In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

9.

Subject to petitioner filing affidavit of undertaking in the above terms within a period of two weeks from today, execution of the impugned order

dated 30.07.2019 shall remain stayed till 30.11.2020.

10.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.