High CourtsSingle Bench

Brij Mohan vs State of Rajasthan and Another

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 26 September 2013 · Citation: (2013) 09 RAJ CK 0193

HON’BLE JUDGES
Narendra Kumar Jain, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 3632 of 2012
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 277 words

Narendra Kumar Jain-II, J.—This misc. petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 14.08.2012 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge(Fast Track) No. 2, Sikar, Headquarter at Srimadhopur (hereinafter referred to as ''the Revisional Court'') in Criminal Revision No. 75/2012 (Brij Mohan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another), whereby the Revisional Court has dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner and upheld the order dated 07.06.2012 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No. 2, Srimadhopur, District Sikar (hereinafter referred to as ''the Trial Court'') in criminal case arising out of First Information Report No. 315/2009 registered at Police Station Thoi, District Sikar by which the Final Report No. 131/2009 has been refused and cognizance for the offences under Sections 447, 427 and 379 IPC has been taken against the petitioner on the basis of Protest Petition filed by the complainant-Respondent No. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the Respondent No. 1-State and perused the impugned orders passed by both the Courts below.

2.

Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and upon careful perusal of the impugned orders passed by both the Courts below, I find no error or illegality in the impugned orders passed by both the Courts below and the same require no interference by this Court under it''s inherent jurisdiction u/s 482 Cr.P.C.

3.

Consequently, the misc. petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C., being devoid of merits fails and the same is hereby dismissed. Since misc. petition filed u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been dismissed, therefore, the stay application also stands dismissed.