High CourtsSingle Bench

Brijesh Kantilal Padaliya vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 1 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 GUJ CK 0002

HON’BLE JUDGES
Nirzar S. Desai, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120(B), 406, 419, 420, 468, 471
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 21162 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

40 paragraphs · 685 words

Nirzar S. Desai, J

1.

Heard learned advocate Mr. applicant and learned Prosecutor Mr. Himanshu respondent â€" State.

2.

This application is filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail in connection with the FIR

registered at C.R.No.11211057211235/2021 with City `A’ Division Police Station, Surendranagar for the offence punishable under Sections 406,

419, 420, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that, the applicant is not involved in commission of offence as alleged in the FIR and therefore,

looking to the role of the applicant and nature of the allegations, the applicant is required to be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable terms and

conditions.

4.

On the other hand, learned APP appearing for the respondent â€" State opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the

offence.

5.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations, this Court is of the opinion that, discretion is required to be

exercised to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. This Court has considered the following facts while exercising discretion in favour of the applicant :-

i. Investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed.

ii. The applicant is in jail since 22.6.2021.

iii. Learned advocate for the petitioner, upon instructions, states that out of total amount of Rs.24,62,730/- for which allegation of fraud committed

against the applicant and other co-accused, Rs.19,00,000/- is recovered and pending amount of Rs.5,60,730/- shall be deposited by the present

applicant before the trial court latest by 15.3.2022.

iv. There are no other past antecedents against the applicant.

6.

In view of the aforesaid facts, without discussing the evidence in detail, this Court, prima facie, is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, present application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in

connection with the FIR registered at C.R.No.11211057211235/2021 with City `A’ Division Police Station, Surendranagar on executing personal

bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the

conditions that the applicant shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] not to leave the Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

[d] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[e] furnish the present address of residence along with the proof to the Investigating Officer concerned and also to the Court at the time of execution

of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[f] mark his presence before the concerned police station in the first week of every month till the trial is over;

[g] appear before the Investigating Officer concerned, as and when required for investigation purpose and attend the Court concerned regularly.

[h] If the applicant fails to deposit an amount of Rs.5,60,730/- before the trial court latest by 15.3.2022, the bail granted to the applicant shall

automatically stands cancelled.

7.

The Authorities will release the applicant only if the applicant is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of

any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

8.

Bail bond to be executed before the learned Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete,

modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. At the trial, learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of

preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

9.

The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

10.

Direct service is permitted.