High CourtsSingle Bench

Brijesh Kumar Gupta vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 17 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 P&H CK 0184

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 22, 25, 29 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 201, 420 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 20281 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 432 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

The petitioner prays for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 211 dated 20.11.2019, registered under Section 22 of the NDPS Act, 1985 and Sections

420, 201 of the IPC (Sections 25, 29 of the NDPS Act added later on) at Police Station Boha, District Mansa.

The operative part of the order dated 10.08.2020, vide which the petitioner has been granted interim bail, is reproduced below:

“Learned State counsel seeks still further time to file a detailed affidavit of a gazetted officer as regards the role of the each petitioner (as per the

case of the investigating agency) with him submitting that it being a very detailed affidavit, it could not be vetted on time.

Adjourned to 13.08.2020, with it made clear that if the affidavit is not filed well in time for it to be actually listed and downloaded onto the computer of

this court, the petitioners, who are stated to be in custody since November 2019, would be entitled to interim bail in their favour especially as Dr.

Sidhu, learned senior counsel appearing one of them, has stated that there is no other criminal case registered against most of them.

As regards the petitioner in CRM-M-20281 of 2020, i.e. Brijesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel appearing for him submits that his case is not different

to that of the petitioner in CRM-M-1982 of 2020 (Adish Jain) and therefore he is entitled to the same concession of interim anticipatory bail.

Learned State counsel though submits that the case of each petitioner is slightly different from the other, however he could not deny that substantially

they may not be that different, subject to what would be stated in the affidavit to be filed.

That being so, the petitioner in CRM-M-20281 of 2020 is also directed to join investigation and if, upon so joining, he is sought to be arrested, he would

be released on interim bail, on his furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Ilaqa Magistrate.â€​

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, in pursuance to the order dated 10.08.2020, has already appeared before the

SHO/Investigating Officer and has joined the investigation.

Learned counsel for the State, on telephonic instructions from ASI Gurmail Singh, has not disputed the factual position and submits that the petitioner

has joined the investigation and is no more required for any further investigation.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to the petitioner, vide order dated 10.08.2020, is made absolute subject to the

conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.