High CourtsDivision Bench

Bsp Employees Consumers Cooperative Store Ltd. vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 19 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 CHH CK 0242

HON’BLE JUDGES
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J · RAM PRASANNA SHARMA, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No. 318, 319, 321, 323, 326, 330, 331, 332, 334, 335, 336, 344, 382 of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 195 words
1.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties on the applications for condonation of delay in filing the appeals (IA No.01/18) in all the above

mentioned cases except WA No.376/2018, WA No.377/2018 & WA No.382/2018, delay in filing the appeals is hereby condoned.

2.

We have also heard the learned counsel for the Appellants/Writ Petitioners. We have also heard the learned Additional Advocate General.

3.

Whatever be the contentions of the appellants in these appeals, the fact of the matter remains that the impugned order, on its face, was issued by

the learned Single Judge on the premise of a request on behalf of the Writ Petitioners that the Writ Petitions may be disposed of in terms of the verdict

in the case Ghanaram Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others (WPS-6107 of 2017). That being so, judicial comity and propriety do not persuade

us to entertain these Writ Appeals. We cannot but therefore, close this Writ Appeals without prejudice to the right, if any, of the Writ

Petitioners/appellants to pursue any remedy before the learned Single Judge, by way of review or otherwise.

4.

Subject to what is aforesaid, these Writ Appeals are dismissed.