AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 157 wordsKurian Joseph, C.J.—The Writ Petition is filed mainly with the following prayer:
i) That the Respondents may kindly be directed to regularize/grant work charge status, to the Petitioner w.e.f. 1.1.1999 (as per the scheme framed in Mool Raj Upadhyaya v. State of H.P. by the Hon''ble Apex Court), when he is completing more than 10 years of service with all consequential benefits.
According to the Petitioner, his case is covered by the decision of Hon''ble Apex Court in P.V. Papanna and others Vs. K. Padmanabhaiah, . The Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment alongwith copy of the Writ Petition before the first Respondent, in which case, the first Respondent will look into the matter, verify the facts and take appropriate action in accordance with law, adverting to the submissions made by the Petitioner within another four months.
With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.
