High CourtsDivision Bench

Budri Narain vs Sheo Koer

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 2 June 1885 · Citation: (1885) ILR (Cal) 716

HON’BLE JUDGES
Richard Garth, C.J · Mitter, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 132 words

Richard Garth, C.J. and Mitter, J.—We find that it has been decided by the Allahabad High Court, in the case of Haidri Bai v. The East Indian Railway Co. ILR 1 All. 687 that where the High Courts orders an appellant to give security for costs, the Court may extend the time within which it orders the security to be furnished if an application is made within that time; but if the security is not given within the time ordered by the Court, and no application is made within that time to extend the time for giving security, the Court is bound by Section 549 of the CPC to reject the appeal.

2.

We agree that this is the proper construction of the section, and we accordingly dismiss the appeal with costs.