Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 08 CAT CK 0025

Butai Sharma vs General Manager Northern Railway Headquarters Office Baroda House & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 3 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manjula Das, J · A.K. Bishnoi, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 1439 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 358 words

Manjula Das, J

(Through Video Conferencing)

1.

The applicant retired from service of the Northern Railway on 31.03.2019. According to him, at the time of retirement, the respondents deducted a

sum of Rs.9,32,275/- from his retirement benefits, without issuing any notice to him. Vide said order, he was also directed to deposit a sum of

Rs.2,84,300/-. Aggrieved by this order, the applicant has filed the present O.A., claiming the following reliefs:-

“i. Refund a sum of Rs.9,32,275 of alleged “recoverable debt†with interest @24% p.a. from the date of wrong deduction till refund of the

payment.

ii. Re-fix last pay drawn of Butai Sharma, grant him notional promotion and its all benefits.

iii. Re-fix his pension according to notional promotion;

iv. Grant him Compensation and damages; and

v. Cost of the litigation & legal fees.â€​

2.

The applicant submitted that against the said impugned order, he has already preferred a representation/legal notice on 11.01.2020, which is still

pending with the respondents.

3.

On the other hand, learned counsel for respondents submitted that the prescribed procedure was duly followed by the respondents before deducting

a sum of Rs. 9,32,275/- from the retirement benefits of the applicant and prayed for dismissal of the O.A.

4.

Heard Mr. A K Gupta, learned counsel for applicant and Ms. Neetu Mishra, learned proxy counsel for Mr. Satpal Singh, learned counsel for

respondents.

5.

The grievance of the applicant is that without any notice, the respondents have deducted the huge amount of Rs.9,32,275/- from his retirement

benefits. It is seen that the legal notice/representation preferred by the applicant has still not been responded to by the respondents. We are of the

view that ends of justice would be duly met by directing the competent authority to decide the representation / legal notice of the applicant within a

time frame.

6.

We, therefore, dispose of the O.A., directing the respondents to dispose of the pending representation / legal notice dated 11.01.2020 submitted by

the applicant, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, under intimation to the applicant. There shall be no order

as to costs.