High CourtsDivision Bench

C P Trivedi VsUnion Of India And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 25 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 DEL CK 0209

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan, J · Navin Chawla, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 1503 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 329 words

Manmohan, J

C.M.No.4288/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.1503/2022

1.

The matter has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2.

Present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the Respondents to approve the medical board proceedings held on 22nd June

2021 wherein the duly constituted medical board recommended that the Petitioner suffered from 58% disability and declared him in medical category

SHAPE-5 unfit for further service in BSF. Petitioner also seeks directions to the Respondents to board out the Petitioner from service and to thereby

grant him disability pension with all consequential benefits as per rules.

3.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that on 30th August 2003, the Petitioner sustained multiple splinter injuries in both his lower limbs and

upper limbs while being engaged in an anti-terrorist operation in Srinagar. He states that over the years, the Petitioner’s medical condition has

deteriorated.

4.

He states that the Director General-BSF has issued a ‘Suitability Certificate’ on 27th April 2021 to the Petitioner to treat the Petitioner as fit

for service consistent with his medical condition. However, he points out that this suitability certificate was entirely subject to the outcome and findings

of the medical board.

5.

He also states that a Review Medical Board dated 22nd June 2021 was convened, which opined that the Petitioner’s disability had aggravated

to 58% in permanent category and the Petitioner was placed in SHAPE 5 category unfit for further service in BSF.

6.

Issue notice. Mr.Vijay Joshi, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents. He points out that the representations filed by the Petitioners

are already pending consideration before the competent authority.

7.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, this Court directs Respondent no.2 to treat the present writ petition as a representation by the Petitioner and decide

the same way of a reasoned order, in accordance with law, within six weeks. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition stands disposed of.