High Courts(2017) 10 MP CK 0017

Chairman Cum Managing Director vs Shri Anil Madhav Chincholkar

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 9 October 2017

RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
533 of 2010 & 631 of 2010

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

258 paragraphs · 2,051 words
1.

These two appeals (CRA No.533/2010 and CRA

No.631/2010) have been filed against common

judgment dated 19.01.2010 passed in Sessions

Trial No.60/2005. Hence, both the appeals are

heard together and are decided by this common

judgment.

2.

The trial Court held the appellant Bittu @ Aditya

Kumar Jaat guilty for commission offence

punishable under Sections 302 and 394 / 394 of

IPC and awarded sentence for life imprisonment

each. The trial Court also held him guilty for

commission of offence punishable under Section

25 (1-A) and 27(1) of Arms Act and awarded

rigorous imprisonment for five years each.

3.

The trial Court held appellant Dhiraj @ Sourabh

Jaat guilty for commission of offence punishable

under Sections 302 / 34 and 394 / 397 of IPC and

awarded sentence of life imprisonment each. The trial Court ordered that the sentence awarded to

the appellants shall run concurrently.

4.

Prosecution story in brief is that on 29.11.2004 at

around 9 O''clock in the morning, three persons

namely Krishna Kumar Jain, Rakesh Soni and

Nikhilesh Soni proceeded to Sagar from

Narsinghpur in a Santro Car. Krishna Kumar Jain

was driving the car, Rakesh Soni was sitting on

the front seat and Nikhilesh Soni was sitting on

the back seat. When they were passing through

Jhiraghati, a black colour Indigo Car had crossed

their car and the car was stopped in front of their

car. The Santro Car was also stopped. Accused

persons entered into the Santro Car on the point

of pistol. Krishna Kumar Jain offered some

resistance and he was shot by a revolver and he died. Rakesh Soni also received injuries. After

traveling two kilometers, the car was stopped

and the accused persons threw the dead body of

the deceased in a trench in a valley. After

traveling further five minutes, Rakesh Soni and Nikhilesh Soni were also forced to leave the car.

Accused persons had taken the Santro Car

alongwith the property i.e. cash of Rs.1,05,000/-,

51 kgs silver and other silver. Report was lodged

at the Police Station Suatal. Thereafter, near

Shyam Talkies, Ripta Kandeli, accused Aditya @

Bittu was caught hold by the police with Santro

Car, silver and cash, which were seized from his

possession. Indigo Car was seized by the police.

Subsequently, other accused persons were

arrested. Police filed the charge-sheet. Accused

persons abjured their guilt. The trial Court

prosecuted seven persons. Some persons were

absconding. The trial Court convicted the

appellants Bittu @ Aditya Kumar Jaat and Dhiraj

@ Sourabh Jaat. Some persons were acquitted.

5.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of

appellants have contended that there is no

evidence against the appellant. The prosecution

has failed to prove the offence beyond reasonable

doubt against the appellants. Hence, the trial Court has committed an error in convicting the

appellants.

6.

Learned Panel Lawyer appearing on behalf of the

respondent/State has contented that the

prosecution has established the guilt of the

appellants beyond reasonable doubt. The trial

Court has rightly convicted the appellants and

awarded proper sentence in view of the gravity of

the offence.

7.

The trial Court passed a detailed judgment. PW-1

Rakesh Soni deposed that on 29.11.2004, he

alongwith his nephew Nikhilesh Soni and

deceased K.K. Jain were going to Sagar in a

Santro Car from Narsinghpur. They proceeded

for Narsinghpur at around 9:15 O''clock in the

morning. When they reached near Jhiraghati, one

black colour Indica Car overtook their car and it

was stopped in front of their vehicle, due to

which they had to stop their car. Three gangsters

alighted from the car. They had revolver in their

hands and they captured the car. Two robbers entered into the Santro Car and the third robber

was driving Indigo car. They were forced to sit in

the Santro Car. They had taken their documents

and belongings. K.K. Jain offered some

resistance, hence, one person had opened fire at

him. Thereafter, the vehicle was stopped after

some distance and body of Mr. K.K. Jain was

thrown in a trench. Rakesh Soni received injury

on his right eye. After some distance, they were

also forced to leave the car. Thereafter, they had

taken lift in a truck upto some distance and they

reached Suatal Police Station on a moped.

Rakesh Soni lodged the FIR. One of robber told

his name as Aditya and he was wearing black

shirt and another person told his name as Dhiraj.

Rakesh Soni identified both the persons in the

Court. The third person, who was driving the car,

was Somveer. The witness admitted that he

lodged the FIR Ex.P/1 and signed the same. He

further deposed that there was cash of

Rs.1,05,000/- and near about 38.5 kgs silver in the car belonging to him. There was property of

Mr. K.K. Jain i.e. Rs.8-8.5 lakh cash and 50 kgs

silver. He further deposed that after the incident,

Tehsildar conducted identification parade and he

identified accused Aditya, who had fired gun

shot. Identification memo is Ex.P/2 and he signed

the same. He also identified accused Dhiraj in the

office of Tehsildar Kareli and signed the

identification memo Ex.P/3. He further deposed

that article A is looted brief case (attaichi) and

article D is property of Mr. Jain. He identified

cash, property and a bag.

8.

PW-2 Smt. Smita Jain is the wife of deceased K.K.

Jain. She deposed that her husband had gone to

Sagar in a Santro Car bearing registration No.

MP-15-A-3421 and she had a talk with her husband on mobile. Last time she had talked with

him at around 10:30-11:00 O''clock in the night

and in the afternoon she came to know that her

husband had been killed.

9.

PW-3 Arvind Singh deposed that he was posted as Tehsildar and at around 3 O''clock in the

afternoon he had conducted identification.

Accused Aditya @ Bittu was produced. He was

covered. Other six persons were also mixed with

him. Rakesh Soni identified accused person. He

prepared identification memo and signed the

same. Nikhilesh Soni also identified the accused.

Rakesh Soni and Nikhilesh Soni also signed the

identification memo. Naib Tehsildar Swati

Fauzdar was also present during identification.

She prepared the identification memo Ex.P/2 and

also signed the same.

10.

PW-4 Dr. S.K. Nema deposed that he was posted

on 29.11.2004 Medical Officer at Primary Health

Center, Warman and on the aforesaid date he

had performed postmortem on the body of deceased Krishna Kumar Jain. He noticed

following injuries on the person of the deceased :

1.

Entry wound of fire arm 03x03x10 CM on forehead.

2.

Exit wound 03x03 CM.

3.

One abrasion 2x1/2 CM &

4.

One blister on right thigh.

There was fracture of frontal and parietal region

of head. The deceased died due to gun shot

injury suffered by him on his head. He further

deposed that on the aforesaid date, he also

examined Rakesh Soni son of Ramgopal Soni and

noticed one lacerated wound ? inch x 1/8 inch x

1/8 inch at the forehead, which was caused by

hard and blunt object.

10.

PW-5 Rajkumar deposed that accused Kedar was

working in his shop. He had taken leave. He had

informed him that he was going to Jabalpur. He

further deposed that police told him that Kedar

was arrested because he had murdered a person

and committed robbery.

11.

PW-6 Narayan deposed that at around 10:30 in

the night, two person met with him and they told

him that robbers had killed one person. He had

gone at the police station alongwith those two

persons on his motorbike.

12.

PW-7 Pankaj Nema deposed that before him,

Indigo Car and Santro Car were seized. Some

properties were also seized. Article A attaichi

was seized from the car. Similarly, article B, C,

D, were also seized. Currency of Rs.1,05,000/-

was seized. Silver articles, sillies (pieces) of

silver and cash were seized. He admitted his

signatures on the seizure memos. The police

catch hold one robber and before him, police also

catch hold another robber. Police had taken

those persons to the police station. The revolver

was seized before him and he signed the same.

He alongwith other persons remained at the

police station for near about 6-7 hours. He

further deposed that he signed the seizure memo

Ex.P/11, vide which revolver was seized from the

possession of accused Bittu.

13.

PW-8 Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi deposed that he

was posted as Naib Tehsildar, Kareli and on

09.12.2004, he had conducted identification

parade of accused Satish Sharma and Kedar. The witnesses had identified the accused persons.

Identification memo is Ex.P/12, he signed the

same. He deposed that Naib Tehsildar Manoj

Chourasiya also signed the same.

14.

PW-13 S.Y. Khan deposed that he was posted as

Assistant Sub Inspector on 29.11.2004 at Police

Station Suatal. Rakesh Soni lodged a report at

the police station, which is Ex.P1 and he signed

the same. Rakesh Soni was sent for medical

examination. He further deposed that he

prepared spot map Ex.P/24 on 29.11.2004 and

signed the same. Seizure memo is Ex.P/20 and he

signed the same. Some articles were also seized.

He further deposed that he recorded statements

of Rakesh Soni on 29.11.2004. He also recorded

statements of Nikhilesh Soni, Narayan Tiwari, Ms. Nisha Thakre, Rajkumar Gupta, Dharmendra

Yadav, Laxman, Mukesh, Moolcahnd Saini,

Babulal and Captain Suresh Singh. Accused

Yashveer @ Fauzi was arrested on 17.03.2004

vide arrest memo Ex.P/31. Omveer son of Banwari Lal Sharma was arrested on 21.03.2005

vide arrest memo Ex.P/32.

15.

PW-14 D.K. Swami deposed that he was posted,

at the relevant time, in the office of the Collector

and the Collector had granted permission to

prosecute the accused Aditya Kumar @ Bittu for

the offence punishable under Section 25 / 27 of

Arms Act.

16.

PW-18 Rajesh Tiwari deposed that he was posted

from 06.01.2004 to 30.06.2005 at Police Station

Suatal. He catch hold accused Aditya @ Bittu

after the incident when he was running and

thereafter, another accused Satish Sharma was

arrested. He further deposed that he recorded

statements of witnesses namely Sachin Jain,

Smita Jain, Kaluram Jain, Abhishesh Jain, Naresh

Kumar Shukla, Sohanlal Sunil, Rajesh Gupta,

Sanjay Kumar, Sanju Nema, Sanjay Baghel,

Janargan Girdhoniya. A car was also seized.

17.

PW-19 Naresh Sharma deposed that he received information on wireless. Thereafter, near Shyam

Talkies accused Aditya @ Bittu was nabbed and

from his possession a revolver with four

cartridges was seized vide seizure memo Ex.P/11

and he signed the same. He identified the

revolver and the cartridges. Thereafter, accused

persons were arrested and from the Santro Car,

various articles were also seized.

18.

PW-1 Rakesh Soni is the eye witness and was

present in the car specifically deposed that both

the accused persons had participated in the

incident. They came there in an Indica Car and

after over taking the Santro Car, they alighted

from the car and thereafter, they had entered in

the Santro Car. He further deposed that he had

heard the names of the accused persons- appellants Aditya and Dhiraj. Appellant Aditya

was identified in the identification parade by

PW-1 Rakesh Soni. He signed the punchnama

Ex.P2. The Tehsildar Mr. Arvind Singh (PW-3),

who conducted the identification, verified the fact of conducting identification parade. Aditya

had caused the gun shot injury to the deceased

and the deceased was died due to the aforesaid

gun shot injury. This fact has been proved from

the evidence of PW-4 Dr. S.K. Nema, who

performed postmortem of the deceased. A

revolver was seized from the possession of the

appellant. From the aforesaid evidence, in our

opinion, the trial Court has rightly held

appellant-Bittu @ Aditya Kumar Jaat guilty for

commission of offence.

19.

Appellant Dhiraj @ Sourabh Jaat was also

identified in the identification parade by PW-1

Rakesh Soni. Identification memo is Ex.P3.

Identification parade was conducted by PW-8

Naib Tehsildar Mr. Pramod Kumar Choubey. Accused Dhiraj was arrested soon after the

incident alongwith the Santro Car. This fact has

been proved from the evidence of PW-19. The

looted property was seized and it was identified

by the owners. From the aforesaid evidence, in our opinion, the trial Court has rightly held

appellant-Dhiraj @ Sourabh Jaat guilty for

commission of offences.

20.

Looking to the gravity of the offence, we do not

find any merit in these appeals. Both the appeals

(CRA-533-2010 and CRA-631-2010) are hereby

dismissed.