High CourtsSingle Bench

Chaman Deep vs State Of Haryana And Another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 P&H CK 0094

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kshetarpal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226, 227
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 14790 Of 2020(O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 348 words

Anil Kshetarpal, J

The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, with following substantive reliefs:-

"(i) for issuance of suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondens to consider the case of the petitioner for the post of Clerk under VH (Visual Handicap) category vide advertisement no. 5/2019 date of publication 20.6.2019 category no.1 as the petitioner secured 76 marks higher than the cut off i.e 60 of last selected candidate in the final has not considered (ii)further prayed that the process of the advertisement dated 20.6.2019 (Annexure P-1) as well final result (Annexure P-9) dated 3.9.2019 may kindly be stayed during the pendency of the present writ petition."

The petitioner claims that he applied for the post of Clerk under the Visual Handicap category and has secured 76 marks which are higher than the cut off marks obtained by the last selected candidate i.e 60. He claims that his name has been wrongly omitted from the final result declared for the post of Clerk.

Sh. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. AG, Haryana submits that to consider the claim of the petitioner, record of the selection is required to be examined. He further submits that the claim of the petitioner will be considered within one month, if the Court gives an opportunity.

In view of the fair stand taken by the learned State counsel, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula to consider the present writ petition as a representation and decide the same within a period of one month by passing a speaking order. The petitioner shall be given an opportunity of hearing through video conferencing before passing the speaking order. It may be noted here that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the claim of the petitioner shall be decided in accordance with law. Sh. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. AG, Haryana, has undertaken to inform the Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula, in this regard.

Disposed of.