High CourtsSingle Bench

Chamkaur Singh @ Gurpreet Singh @ Gur vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 4 October 2022 · Citation: (2022) 10 P&H CK 0007

HON’BLE JUDGES
Namit Kumar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 304 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 15, 21, 22, 61, 85
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 46415 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 422 words

Namit Kumar, J

This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case bearing FIR No.101 dated 30.06.2022 under Sections 304/120-B of IPC registered at Police Station Makhu, District Ferozepur.

The case of the prosecution is that on 30.06.2022 ASI Kirpal Singh No.1758, Police Station Makhu, Incharge of Police Post Joge Wala, in connection with search of bad elements was present at bus stop of Village Joge Wala, received secret information that Rajpal Singh alias Vicky son of Late Gurdeep Singh along with Zora Singh, Lakhwinder Singh alias Lakhu, Gurpreet Singh alias Gur, Gurcharan Singh alias Gaggu and Buta Singh used to sell heroin and intoxicating tablets as well as injections knowing fully well that such type of intoxicating substance, are sufficient to cause death of a person. Rajpal Singh, who is a drug addict, many times purchased such intoxicated substances, injections from them and also get injected, when he was going on motorcycle make Hero Honda CD Deluxe bearing No. PB-05-W-4860, fell down on earth and died near tubewell of one Swaran Singh son of Amrik Singh.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted concession of interim/anticipatory bail by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Ferozepur, vide order dated 15.09.2022 (Annexure P-2) and thereafter, the said benefit has been withdrawn and his anticipatory bail has been rejected by the said Court vide order dated 23.09.2022 as the petitioner could not join the investigation due to his ill health. However, the learned State counsel submits that apart from the present FIR, three more FIRs have been registered against the petitioner. The details of which are as under:-

1.

FIR No.7 dated 22.01.2014 under Sections 15/61/85 of the NDPS Act.

2.

FIR No.53 dated 22.04.2022 under Sections 21/22/61/85 of the NDPS Act Police Station Makhu.

3.

FIR No.57 dated 28.04.2022 under Sections 21/61/85 of the NDPS Act, Police Station Makhu.

He further submits that in FIR No.7/2014 dated 22.01.2014, the petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of four years. The said fact was not brought to the notice of the Court of learned ASJ, Ferozepur while the interim pre arrest bail was granted vide order dated 15.09.2022 and rather a statement was made before the Court that he is not involved in any other case. Therefore, in view of the above, the petitioner is not entitled for the grant of pre-arrest bail and, consequently, the same is hereby dismissed.