High CourtsSingle Bench

Champa Pant And Another vs R. Minakshi Sunderram And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 November 2021 · Citation: (2021) 11 UK CK 0102

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 205 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 339 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Writ Petition (S/S) No. 18 of 2010 filed by the petitioner was disposed of in terms of judgment rendered in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 894 of 2014 and respondents were directed to consider petitioner's case for grant of family pension within a period of ten weeks.

2.

It is a fact that petitioner's husband served in U.P. Basic Education Board, who got retired from services much before state re-organization and ultimately, he passed away in the year 1982. Since petitioner was not paid family pension, therefore, she filed a writ petition, which was disposed of by Writ Court with a direction to the respondents to consider her case for grant of family pension.

3.

State of U.P. through Secretary, Department of Education was impleaded as respondent no.5 in the writ petition.

4.

Since petitioner's husband had retired from services several years before State reorganization, therefore, liability, if any, to pay family pension was also upon State of U.P.

5.

Learned Standing Counsel has produced in Court today written instructions received by him from Director, Elementary Education. The same is taken on record.

6.

Based on the said written instructions, learned Standing Counsel submits that the entire record, including computation sheets, regarding family pension payable to the petitioner have been forwarded by the Competent Authority in Uttarakhand to State of U.P. Thus, according to him, the State of U.P. shall take further necessary instructions in the matter. Since the liability to pay family pension rests upon State of U.P. in terms of provisions contained in U.P. Reorganization Act, 2000, therefore, in view of forwarding of necessary papers by Competent Authority in Uttarakhand to State of U.P., substantial compliance of the order passed by Writ Court has been made.

7.

Accordingly, contempt petition is closed.

8.

Contempt notices issued to the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 are hereby discharged.

9.

However, petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court, in case of delay in release of family pension to her by State of U.P.