High CourtsSingle Bench

Champalal vs Radheshyam And Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 11 December 2023 · Citation: (2023) 12 MP CK 0038

HON’BLE JUDGES
Achal Kumar Paliwal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 22 Rule 9 · Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal No. 826 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 99 words

Achal Kumar Paliwal, J

Heard on I.A.No.5485/2022 an application for bringing L.Rs of respondent no.3 on record, I.A.No.672/2023 an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I.A.No.673/2023 an application under under Order 22 Rule 9 of CPC.

Learned counsel for L.Rs. of respondent no.3 has no objection.

In view of the facts mentioned in the applications, the same are allowed. The delay is condoned. L.Rs. of respondent no.3 be brought on record. Consequently, abatement is set aside. Necessary amendment in the cause title be carried out within seven working days. I.As are disposed off.

List after two weeks.