High CourtsSingle Bench

Chanchla Devi vs State Of H.P And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 11 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 SHI CK 0031

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 693 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 319 words

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J

1.

As per the submissions made in the instant writ petition, the petitioner was appointed as Trained Graduate Teacher (Medical) in the respondents

department in the year 2008. In April 2020, she was promoted as Lecturer (Biology) and posted at Government Senior Secondary School Ramshehar

District Solan, H.P.

2.

In view of certain adverse family circumstances faced by her, the petitioner by way of representation dated 14.01.2022 (Annexure P-1) requested

respondents/department to transfer her to one of the stations of her choice mentioned therein. Respondent No.2 after examining the representation of

the petitioner apprised her on 21.01.2022 (Annexure P-2) that she could not be adjusted at the place sought by her as the office order with respect to

the desired stations had already been issued in the name of other employees. The petitioner was directed by respondent No.2 to provide five stations

of her choice afresh. Learned counsel further submitted that subsequent to communication dated 21.01.2022, petitioner has furnished another

representation dated 24.01.2022 (Annexure P-3) specifying therein stations of her choice, where posts are lying vacant and where she can

conveniently be adjusted.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that her client would be satisfied, in case respondents are directed to decide the pending representation of

the petitioner dated 24.01.2022 (Annexure P-3) within a time bound manner.

Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer.

3.

Therefore, in view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the

respondents/competent authority to decide the representation made by the petitioner dated 24.01.2022 (Annexure P-3) within a period of three weeks

from today. Petitioner is also at liberty to make a comprehensive representation afresh to the respondents specifying therein five places of her choice

within a week from today, where she can be adjusted. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.