High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 11 UK CK 0135

Chandan Singh Bisht vs Union of India and others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 4 November 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. (SS) 1873 of 2003

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 133 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.—Heard Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Anjali Bhargawa, Advocate for the Union of India.

2.

A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the Union of India that the issue involved u/s 14 (2) of the Tribunals Act.

3.

In view of the constitution Bench judgment of the Hon''ble Apex Court in L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India and others, , such cases, in the first instance should be heard by the Central Administrative Tribunal, alone.

4.

Since the matter is cognizable in the first instance by the Central Administrative Tribunal, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.

5.

Writ petition is therefore dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.

6.

No order as to costs.