High CourtsSingle Bench

Chander Devi And Others vs Pardeep And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 February 2019 · Citation: (2019) 02 P&H CK 0117

HON’BLE JUDGES
Avneesh Jhingan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal Order No. 8158 Of 2015
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

51 paragraphs · 735 words

Avneesh Jhingan, J

The award dated 04.08.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hisar (for brevity 'the Tribunal') has been assailed by the legal heirs of Rameshwar seeking enhancement of compensation awarded under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act')

The widow and three minor daughters of Rameshwar are the appellants. The driver of car Duster bearing registration No. HR-16-M-4449 (hereinafter referred to as 'offending vehicle), owner and insurer (i.e. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.) of the offending vehicle have been arrayed as respondents no. 1 to 3 respectively in the appeal.

The brief facts necessary for adjudication of the present appeal are that a motor vehicular accident took place on 09.02.2014 in which Rameshwar, who was riding a motorcycle bearing registration No. HR-21-E-3726 sustained multiple grievous injuries. He was taken to General Hospital, Hansi and thereafter to CMC, Hisar where he was declared dead. FIR No. 50, dated 10.02.2014 was registered.

A claim petition under Section 166 of the Act was filed. The Tribunal after considering the facts and on appreciating the evidence adduced, held that the accident was caused due to rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle. The driver, owner and insurer of the offending vehicle were held jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation. The Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.14,85,000/- alongwith interest @ 7% per annum. The amount awarded included Rs.25000/- each for funeral expenses and towards love and affection and Rs.4600/- for transportation and misc. expenses.

In the claim petition, it was pleaded that the deceased was 46 years old and relying upon the income tax of the deceased, the Tribunal assessed the annual earnings of the deceased as Rs.1,78,800/-; 1/3rd deduction for self-expenses was made and multiplier of '12' was applied.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paper book. The grievance of learned counsel for the appellants is four fold; no future prospects have been awarded; secondly, 1/3rd deduction for self-expenses has wrongly been made instead of 1/4th as the deceased was survived by his four dependants; thirdly, multiplier of 12 has wrongly been applied instead of 13; lastly, the amounts awarded under the conventional heads are on lower side.

Learned counsel for the insurer defends the award and resisted any further enhancement. Her grievance is that no amount can be awarded for loss of love and affection.

There is no dispute between the parties with regard to the age of the deceased and the income taken by the Tribunal for calculating compensation.

Having due regard to the decisions of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi and others; 2017 (4) RCR (Civil) 1009 and Hem Raj vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd 2018 (2) PLR 480; 25% future prospects are awarded, as the deceased was 46 years old at the time of accident and falls in the category of self employed having fixed wages.

The deceased was survived by four dependants and 1/4th deduction for self-expenses is to be made in consonance with the decision of the Supreme Court in Smt. Sarla Verma and others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and another; (2009) 6 SCC 121 and multiplier of 13 is to be applied, as the deceased falls in the age group of 46 to 50.

In consonance with the decision of the Supreme Court in Pranay Sethi's case (supra), claimants are also entitled to Rs.15000/- each for funeral expenses and for loss of estate. The widow of the deceased is entitled to Rs.40,000/- for loss of consortium. No amount is awarded for loss of love and affection.

In view of afore-said discussion, the compensation is re-calculated as under:

Head

Compensation awarded

(i)

Annual income

Rs. 1,78,800/- per month

(ii)

Future prospects at 25%

Rs. 44,700/-

(iii)

Total Income

Rs. 2,23,500/- per month

(iv)

Deduction

of

personal

Rs. 55,875/- (i.e. 1/4th of total income)

expenses

(v)

Multiplier

13 (as per age of deceased)

(vi)

Loss of income

167625x13= Rs.21,79,125/-

(vii)

Funeral expenses

Rs.15,000/-

(viii)

Loss of estate

Rs.15,000/-

(ix)

Loss of consortium

Rs.40,000/-

Total

Compensation

Rs.22,79,125/-

awarded

The award dated 04.08.2015 is modified to the extent that amount of Rs.14,85,000/- awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced to Rs.22,79,125/-. The appellants shall be entitled to the enhanced amount alongwith interest @7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the realization of the amount.

The appeal is allowed in the afore-said terms.