High CourtsSingle Bench

Chandermal And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 3 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 DEL CK 0082

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.S.Sistani, J · Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Section 24(2) · Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 4, 6
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No.2255 OF 2016
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

34 paragraphs · 676 words

G.S. SISTANI, J

1.

This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect

to 1 Bigha 7 Biswas land comprised in Khasra No. 15/2/2 situated in the revenue estate of village Ali, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject

land') is deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as '2013 Act') as neither the actual physical possession of the subject land has been taken nor the

compensation in respect thereof has been paid to the petitioners.

2.

In this case, a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') was issued on 16.04.1964 and a

declaration under Section 6 was made on 22.12.1966. Thereafter, an award bearing no. 3/97-98 was passed on 05.12.1997 but since there was no

mention of Khasra No. 15/2/2(1-07), subsequently the LAC passed corrigendum to the Award on 10.12.1997.

3.

Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the actual physical possession of the subject land has not been taken

and compensation in respect thereof has not been paid, thus the petitioners would be entitled to a declaration under Section 24 (2) of the 2013 Act.

4.

Ms. Astha Tyagi, learned counsel for the LAC submits that the possession of Khasra No. 15/2/2 measuring 1 Bigha 7 Biswa has been taken over,

however there is no record of payment of compensation in Naksha Mutzamin to the petitioners. Relevant Para.6 and Para.7 of the counter affidavit

filed by LAC reads as under :-

6.

…That initially the Khasra No. 15/2/2 (1-07) in question was not mentioned in the Award but was included subsequently by making modification in

the Award and passing corrigendum. (kindly refer to Page 40 of the petition). The petitioners land bearing Khasra No, 15/2/2 was included by

corrigendum vide Award No. 3/97-98 (supply).â€​

“7. That the details as regards compensation are not found in the Naksha Mutzamin with the respondent and the respondent has called for further

records to ascertain the status of the compensation and other documents. That the possession of the land in question Khasra No. 15/2(01-07) has been

taken by the answering respondent on 26.05.1998.

5.

Mr. M.K. Singh, learned Counsel for DDA submits that the possession of the land has been handed over by LAC/L&B Department on 26.05.1998.

Relevant Para of the Counter Affidavit filed by DDA is as under:-

5(iii) That it is submitted that the physical possession of the above stated land of Khasra No. 15/2 (1-7) of village Aali, Delhi, to the extent as

mentioned above, have been handed over to DDA by LAC/L&B Dept., GNCTD on 26.05.1998, the acquisition is complete qua such land and such

land vests in the government free from any encumbrance.â€​

6.

We have heard learned counsels for the parties.

7.

Reading of the counter affidavit filed by LAC makes it clear that possession of land falling in Khasra No 15/2/2 measuring 1 Bigha and 7 Biswa of

village Aali, New Delhi, has been taken but the compensation in respect of the subject land thereof has not been tendered to the petitioners.

8.

Taking into consideration the submissions made and the stand taken by LAC that possession of the subject land has been taken over but the

compensation in respect of subject land has not been tendered to the petitioners, we are of the considered view that the necessary ingredients of

Section 24 (2) of 2013 Act stand satisfied. Since the award having been announced more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 Act

and, having regard to the fact that the compensation has not been tendered, the petitioners are entitled to a declaration that the acquisition proceedings

initiated under the Act with regard to the subject land is deemed to have been lapsed. It is ordered accordingly.

9.

The writ petition stands disposed of in above terms.