High CourtsDivision Bench

Chandra Shekhar Tiwari vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 14 March 2022 · Citation: (2022) 03 UK CK 0139

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Mishra, J · R.C. Khulbe, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 134 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 224 words

S.K. Mishra, J

1.

The petitioner is a retired employee of the respondent-Corporation. His complaint is that the retirement benefits due to him have not been paid. The benefits include gratuity, leave encashment, arrears of 7th pay commission and other benefits.

2.

Mr. D.S. Patni, the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent-Corporation, does not actually dispute the liability. However, the learned Senior Counsel does not, of course, agree to the exact amount due. His main contention is paucity of funds.

3.

The petitioner is a retired employee and we feel that it will be unfair to deprive him of his retiral benefits. Therefore, we dispose of the Writ Petition by directing the respondent nos. 2 to 4, i.e. the Uttarakhand Pey Jal Sansadhan Vikas Evam Nirman Nigam, as follows:

(i) Within a period of two months from today, the amount of gratuity shall be paid to the petitioner.

(ii) Within a period of five months from today, the amount of leave encashment shall be paid to the petitioner.

(ii) Within a period of seven months from today, the entire amount due by way of arrears of 7th pay commission shall be paid to the petitioner.

4.

In sequel thereto, all pending applications also stand disposed of.

5.

Urgent copy of this order be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties, as per Rules.