High CourtsDivision Bench(1893) 05 CAL CK 0003

Chathu Rai vs Niranjan Rai

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 9 May 1893 · Citation: (1893) ILR (Cal) 729

HON’BLE JUDGES
Trevelyan, J · Rampini, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 166 words

Trevelyan and Rampini, JJ.—In this case the learned Counsel in support of the order of the Magistrate has only been able to refer us to Section 437, Code of Criminal Procedure, in support of the power of the Magistrate to make the order which he had passed. Now, that section only allows a further enquiry into a complaint. A complaint means a complaint of an offence [Section 4 (a), Criminal Procedure Code], and an offence is defined in the Code as "any act or omission made punishable by any law for the time being in force." We think it is quite clear that Section 437, which enables a Magistrate to make an order for further enquiry does not authorize him to order a further enquiry in a case u/s 145, which is not directed to any offence at all. That being so, we think that this rule must be made absolute, and that the orders dated the 9th February and 24th February should be set aside.