High CourtsDivision Bench

Chet Ram vs State of HP

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 2 January 2013 · Citation: (2013) 01 SHI CK 0068

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surinder Singh, J · R.B. Misra, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 9084 of 2012-I
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 169 words

Surinder Singh J.

1.

Petitioner feels aggrieved by his transfer order Annexure P-1. His name figures at serial No. 20. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, he had already represented to the respondents for his transfer from Kinnaur District to Sirmaur District vide Annexures P-4 & P-5 dated 2.5.2012 & 1.10.2012 respectively, which are still pending. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the instructions of the petitioner, prays that his pending representation be decided in a time bound manner as per the instructions already issued in this behalf Annexures P-2 & P-3. In view of this, respondents are hereby directed to dispose of the said representations within a period of two months from today. In case, petitioner chooses to file some additional representation, he is at liberty to do so within 10 days from today, along with the certified copy of this order. Till then, impugned order, qua petitioner, be not implemented.

2.

With these observations/directions, petition stands disposed of so also the pending applications(s). Copy Dasti.