AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 410 wordsDeoki Nandan, J.—This application u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure arises from an order of the City Magistrate, Varanasi, dated 16th January, 1979 in a case for execution of an order u/s 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.
The objection taken by the applicant is that the City Magistrate being an Executive Magistrate he has had no jurisdiction to entertain the proceedings after the enforcement of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. There is substance in the objection and the learned Assistant Government Advocate conceded that the position after the enforcement of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was that an order passed by an Executive Magistrate u/s 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, had to be executed by the Judicial Magistrate concerned as an order u/s 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
That being so, the order passed by the City Magistrate, Varanasi on 16th January, 1979 has to be quashed as being without jurisdiction, but that does not in my opinion, conclude the matter, for the opposite-party wife, who has an order of maintenance in her favour and applied for execution thereof, cannot be blamed for filing the application in the court of the Executive Magistrate, inasmuch as the legal position was not free from doubt and has only recently been settled. Under the circumstances I consider it fit and proper in this case to quash only the order passed by the City Magistrate, Varanasi on 16th January, 1979 and not the proceeding initiated by the application for execution; and further order suo moto that the said proceeding shall be transferred to the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi, who may either dispose off the same himself or assign it to another Judicial Magistrate of competent jurisdiction.
In the result, the application succeeds and is allowed. The order of the City Magistrate, Varanasi dated 16th January, 1979 is quashed, but the proceeding for execution of the order of maintenance u/s 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, initiated by the wife Smt. Shanti Devi against her husband Chhedi Lal in the court of the City Magistrate, Varanasi shall be transferred to the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi who may either dispose off the same himself or assign it to another Judicial Magistrate of competent jurisdiction. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi will take steps to have the case disposed off as speedily as possible.
