High CourtsSingle Bench

Chhotu Ram vs State Of Haryana And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 P&H CK 0073

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amol Rattan Singh, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 14431 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 175 words

Amol Rattan Singh, J

All cases listed today have been taken up for hearing by way of video conferencing because of the situation existing due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of 'CERTIORARI', setting aside the impugned transfer order dated 08.09.2020 (copy Annexure P-3), passed by respondent no. 2, i.e. the Director General, Skill Development and Industrial Training Department, Panchkula, as the petitioner has allegedly been transferred in violation to the transfer policy.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been transferred against the policy, Annexure P-4, which prohibits transfer of persons of the petitioners' cadre from one place to another for a period of 05 years, with the petitioner having been transferred after only 2½ years.

Whereas that may be actually true, however, it is seen that the petitioner has simply been transferred from the Government I.T.I (Women), Hisar, to the Government I.T.I., Hisar, i.e. within Hisar itself.

Consequently, I see absolutely no ground to interfere in the matter.

Dismissed.