High CourtsDivision Bench(1903) 01 MAD CK 0002

Chinna Narayudu vs Harischendana Deo

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 January 1903

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhashyam Ayyangar, J · Benson, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Second Appeal No. 980 of 1901

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 140 words
1.

A preliminary objection to the Plaintiff''s suit in ejectment was taken in the Courts below to the effect that no notice to terminate the Defendant''s

tenancy was given by the Plaintiff prior to bringing the suit. The Courts below overruled this plea on the ground that the Defendant had denied the

landlord''s title, and that therefore no notice was necessary.

2.

The documents referred to by the Courts below asserted the Defendant''s title as a permanent tenant and denied the Plaintiff''s title to give a

lease of the land to a third party. This is not a denial of the relationship of landlord and tenant between the Plaintiff and Defendant which would

render notice unnecessary.

3.

On this ground we allow the second appeal and, reversing the decrees of the Courts below, dismiss the Plaintiff''s suit with costs throughout.