High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 02 UK CK 0051

Chirag Mathur & Another vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 February 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lok Pal Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 202 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 427 words

Lok Pal Singh, J

1.

This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:

i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the FIR No.166 of 2018 under Section 420, 406, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 34

of IPC, P.S. Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2.

The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioners obtained Rs. 5,00,000/- as advance money from the complainant company in lieu of selling its

industrial unit including plant and machinery. After making the advance payment, when the complainant company’s officials visited the site then

they were shocked and surprised to see that no such plant and machinery exists at the site. Thereafter, when the complainant company asked the

petitioners to refund their money back they refused to do so.

3.

Compounding application being IA No.2375 of 2020 has been filed by the parties jointly (petitioners and respondent nos.3) stating that the petitioners

and respondent no.3 have settled their dispute amicably, inasmuch as, the complainant has received their amount back from the petitioners. It is also

stated that the grievance of the complainant has been redressed as the petitioners have returned their money and now there remains no dispute in

between the parties and the respondent no.3 does not wish to prosecute the petitioners. By way of present compounding application, a prayer has

been made to quash the impugned FIR. Along with the application, petitioner no.1 and respondent no.3 have filed their separate affidavits to affirm

what is stated in the application.

4.

State/respondent no.1 and 2 have filed its objections to the compounding application stating that the offence punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468,

471 and 120-B of IPC are non-compoundable as per Section 320 of Cr.P.C.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

6.

Insofar as Sections 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B are concerned, from the perusal of the impugned FIR, it is abundantly clear that no offence is

made out against the petitioners under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC. As regards other Sections viz. 420/406/34 IPC, same are

compoundable offence within the scheme of Section 320 of Cr.P.C.

7.

In view of the above, compounding application is allowed. As a consequence thereof, FIR No.166 of 2018 under Section 420, 406, 465, 467, 468,

471, 120-B, 34 of IPC, P.S. Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar is hereby quashed.

8.

Writ petition stands allowed accordingly.

9.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

10.

No order as to costs.