High CourtsSingle Bench

Chittar Mal vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 22 February 2002 · Citation: (2002) 2 WLN 634

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jagat Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 307, 323, 341
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 579 of 2002
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 292 words

Jagat Singh, J.—This is bail application filed u/s 438, Cr.P.C. on behalf of Chittarmal against whom CR. No. 38/2002 of P.S. Makarana has been registered for the offence under Sections 307, 323 & 341 I.P.C.. His anticipatory bail application has been dismissed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Parbatsar by passing a detailed order dated 11.2.2002.

2.

learned Counsel submits that according to the injury report 4 injuries were found on the person of Surendra Prasad. Out of them 3 were found simple and blunt in nature. He further submitted that co-accused Rupesh and Rajendra Kumar have already been released on bail by the Sessions Court. He submits that he is resident of Distt. Nagaur having immovable property, therefore, he be granted anticipatory bail.

3.

Learned P.P. has opposed it.

4.

Without expressing anything on the merits of the case, looking to the facts and circumstances involved herein, I feel inclined to enlarge the accused applicant on anticipatory bail.

5.

After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case I deem it just and proper to allow this application u/s 438, Cr.P.C. Hence, it is ordered that applicants Chittarmal shall be released on anticipatory bail till filing of challan provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-. [Rs. Ten Thousand] and two sureties in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court, provided further that:

(a) that he shall not make any inducement, threat or promise to anyone acquainted with facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to Police or Court;

(b) he shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer whenever required to do so during pendency of investigation;

(c) he shall not leave India without prior permission of Court.