AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
16 paragraphs · 296 wordsShampa Sarkar, J
This revisional application is taken up for hearing out of turn, due to urgent mentioning.
The defendant in Title Suit No.12 of 2016 has preferred this revisional application for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge(Senior Division)
Bongaon, 24 Parganas (North) for expeditious disposal of the application filed by the defendant on January 21, 2020 challenging the maintainability of
the said Title Suit on the ground that a similar suit arising out of the self same cause of action, between the same parties relating to the same subject
matter, had been dismissed for default on an earlier occasion and a fresh suit was barred under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is
submitted that the said application is pending before the learned Court below and the learned court was continuing with the hearing of the suit.
This revisional application is disposed of directing the learned Court below to dispose of the application filed by the defendants/petitioners dated
January 21, 2020 on the next date or so soon thereafter but not later than for a period of one month, on its own merits and in accordance with law.
As it is informed that the opposite party no.2/plaitiff has already filed his written objection to the said application, I do not see any reason as to why the
said application could not be disposed of.
The petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this revisional application along with a server copy of this order upon the opposite parties within a week
from date.
This revisional application is disposed of.
There will be however no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be given to the parties on priority basis, if the same is applied for.
