High CourtsSingle Bench

Chuni Lal vs State of H.P and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 11 April 2011 · Citation: (2011) 04 SHI CK 0325

HON’BLE JUDGES
Deepak Gupta, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP (T) No. 16099 of 2008
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 318 words

Deepak Gupta, J.—By means of this petition, the Petitioner has prayed that half of his service rendered by him on daily waged basis has to be counted for the purpose of grant of pension.

2.

This Court in State of H.P. and Ors. v. Sarab Dayal, Latest HLJ 2007(2) Volume 18 (HP) 1292 has clearly held that 50% of the continuous service rendered by an employee on daily waged basis has to be counted while calculating his qualifying service for the purpose of pension.

3.

The mandays chart in respect of the Petitioner has been filed by the State and this mandays chart shows that right from 1989 till 1998, the Petitioner worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year. He was granted work charge status of Beldar w.e.f. 1.4.1998. The services rendered by the Petitioner on daily waged basis prior to that date works out to nine years and six months. The Petitioner had worked for 10 years on daily wages, 50% of which works out to 5 years. He was granted work charge status w.e.f. 1.4.1998 and retired on 30.9.2007, i.e., nine years and six months. If half of his services rendered on daily waged basis is taken into consideration, the total qualifying service works out to 14 years and 6 months.

4.

The Respondents are, therefore, directed to treat the qualifying service of the Petitioner to be 14 years and 6 months and to calculate his pension and other retiral benefits accordingly. The needful be done latest by 31.8.2011 and the entire amount due and payable to the Petitioner alongwith interest @ 6% per annum be paid to him on or before the said date failing which the State shall be held liable to pay interest @ 12% per annum from the date of retirement of the Petitioner.

5.

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.