Supreme CourtFull Bench(2002) 04 SC CK 0110

Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad vs Maheshwari Mills Ltd.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 17 April 2002 · Citation: (2002) ECR 274 : (2002) 142 ELT 520 : (2002) 10 SCC 733

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. P. Bharucha, C.J · Shivaraj V. Patil, J · N. Santosh Hedge, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal 9049 of 1996

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 157 words
1.

We have heard learned counsel for the Revenue (Appellant) and find that the order of the Tribunal is correct. Reliance has rightly been placed, given the facts, upon the judgment of this Court in Union of India (UOI) and Others Vs. Madhumilan Syntex Pvt. Ltd. and Another, .

2.

Our attention has been drawn by learned counsel for the appellant to the judgment of this Court in AIR 1989 617 (SC) and it is submitted that a different view has been taken'lherein. We do not think so. The latter judgment only says that there is no estoppel against seeking to take a different view from that taken in an approved classification list. But that judgment does not say that a demand notice can be issued demanding duty on a basis other than that approved in the classification list without seeking to vary the classification list.

3.

The appeals are dismissed.

4.

No order as to costs.