High CourtsDivision Bench

Commissioner of C. Ex. vs Mtr Foods Ltd.

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 13 January 2011 · Citation: (2011) 267 ELT 608

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi Malimath, J · N. Kumar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Central Excise Act, 1944 — Section 35 G, 35 G (1), 35 L
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
C.E.A. No. 61 of 2010
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 251 words

N. Kumar, J.—The question that arises for consideration in this appeal is, whether the Assessee is entitled to exemption from payment of excise duty in respect of Sweetmeats manufactured by them. In other words, the question involved is, whether goods manufactured by the Assessee in the first instance is excisable or not and even if it is excisable, whether they are exempted from paying the tax by virtue of the notifications referred to therein.

2.

The Tribunal has held, the goods are excisable and they are not entitled to exemption. It is against the said order 2010 (173) ECR 60 the appeal is filed u/s 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Sub-section (1) of Section 35G provides for appeal to High Court. It provides that, appeal shall lie to the High Court from every order passed in an appeal by the Appellate Tribunal on or after 1st day of July 2003, not being an order relating, among other things, to the determination of any question having a relation to the rate of duty of excise or to the value of goods for purposes of assessment. Therefore, the question involved in this appeal relates to the rate of duty of excise. It is to be decided by the Apex Court and not by this Court.

3.

In that view of the matter, the appeal is not maintainable. Liberty is reserved to the Appellant to approach the Apex Court u/s 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

4.

Accordingly, appeal is dismissed