High CourtsDivision Bench

Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs vs Ashish Vasantrao Patil

Bombay High Court · Decided on 18 October 2007 · Citation: (2008) 10 STR 5

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.P. Devadhar, J · F.I. Rebello, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Central Excise Appeal No. 4 of 2007

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 106 words
1.

Revenue is in appeal against the order of CESTAT dated 15-2-2006 2006 (3) S.T.R. 184 . By that order, for the reasons set out in para 4, the Learned Tribunal considered the power conferred on it u/s 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 exercised its discretion and reduced penalty to the sum of Rs. 4,000/-

2.

We have taken a view that considering Section 76 and 80, it is open to the Tribunal to exercise such discretion. Once the discretion is exercised and we find that there are germane reasons recorded, the question of law as framed would not arise. Consequently the appeal is dismissed.