High CourtsDivision Bench

Commissioner of Central Excise vs CEGAT

Madras High Court · Decided on 30 July 2001 · Citation: (2001) 133 ELT 542

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. Jayasimha Babu, J · C. Nagappan, J
CASE NUMBER
R.C.P. No. 5 of 2001

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 103 words

R. Jayasimha Babu, J.—The respondent, though served, has not chosen to appear in person, or through Counsel.

2.

Having heard Counsel for the Revenue, we are satisfied that a question requiring our consideration does arise.

3.

The Tribunal is directed to refer the following question of law :

Whether the assessee is entitled to Modvat credits on inputs received under the cover of gate passes endorsed after 1-4-94, despite the terms of

the Notification No. 16/94 dated 30-3-1994 ?

2.

The Tribunal is directed to submit a statement of the case together with the relevant materials for the purpose of deciding the question.