High CourtsDivision Bench

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Delton Cables Ltd.

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 February 2004 · Citation: (2004) 114 ECR 412 : (2004) 167 ELT 144

HON’BLE JUDGES
N.K. Sud, J · J.S. Narang, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Central Excise Rules, 1944 — Rule 173Q(1) · Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 — Section 35H(1)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Central Excise Case No. 22 of 2002
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 104 words
1.

After hearing learned Counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the following question or law arises out of the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi dated 14-6-2001 :-

"Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the provisions of Rule 173Q(1)(b) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 are not applicable even though, admittedly, manufactured goods had not been entered in the books of Accounts ?"

2.

Accordingly, we direct the Tribunal to draw up a statement of the case and refer the aforestated question of law for the opinion of this Court.

The petition stands allowed.