High CourtsFull Bench(2003) 01 DEL CK 0104

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sudhir Kumar Modi

Delhi High Court · Decided on 30 January 2003 · Citation: (2003) 130 TAXMAN 574

HON’BLE JUDGES
Madan B. Lokur, J · Madan B. Loikur, J · D.K. Jain, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
IT Ref. No. 10 of 1984 30 January 2003

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 243 words

D.K. Jain, J.

At the instance of the revenue, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi has referred u/s 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the following question for the opinion of this court :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in confirming the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner holding that the perquisite value of residential accommodation be limited to the value as fixed by the local authority u/s 9 of the U.P. Urban Buildings Act, 1972 ?"

2.

The reference relates to the assessment year 1975-76. Since answer to question stands concluded by the decision of this court, it is not necessary to state the facts. An issue, similar to the one raised in this reference, came up for consideration of this court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M.K. Modi, wherein it was held that for determination of the market value of the perquisite provided to the assessed by way of a rent-free accommodation, the basis has to be the standard rent fixed by the Rent Controller in respect of similar accommodation by another person u/s 9 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. Following the said decision, we answer the question referred in the affirmative, i.e., in favor of the assessed and against the revenue.

3.

The reference stands disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.