High CourtsFull Bench(2003) 04 DEL CK 0087

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Vikas Leasing Ltd.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 10 April 2003 · Citation: (2003) 131 TAXMAN 303

HON’BLE JUDGES
Madan B. Lokur, J · Madan B. Loikur, J · D.K. Jain, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
IT Appeal No. 39 of 2002 10 April 2003

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 222 words

In this appeal u/s 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the revenue seeks to challenge the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 30-7-2001 in ITA No. 6053 (Del) of 1995, pertaining to the assessment year 1992-93.

2.

The only issue, which is sought to be raised by the revenue, is as to whether the commercial vehicles leased out by the assessed for running them on hire, would be entitled to higher rate of depreciation at 40 per cent or not.

3.

Insofar as this court is concerned, the issue raised is no more res integra. In Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bansal Credits Limited, Pratap Singh, MGF Limited, Motor and General Finance Ltd., MGF India Limited, Rungta Irrigation Ltd. and Anuvrat (P) Limited, this court has held that on a plain reading of section 32 of the Act and Entry III(2)(ii) in Appendix I to the Rules, it is clear that it is the user of the substantial asset which is relevant for determining the percentage of depreciation under the said section. If it is found that the leased out vehicle is used for running it on hire, depreciation at a higher rate is to be allowed.

4.

In view of the said decision, no question of law survives for our consideration.

5.

The appeal is accordingly, dismissed.