High CourtsDivision Bench(1974) 03 AHC CK 0021

Commissioner of Sales Tax vs Dhannamal Ram Gopal

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 22 March 1974 · Citation: (1975) 36 STC 445

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satish Chandka, J · N.D. Ojha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Sales Tax Reference No. 461 of 1972

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 131 words

Satish Chandra, J.—The question of law that requires our consideration in this reference is whether rice bran can be taxed as bhusi. In Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Jamuna Prasad Gur Prasad 1974 U.P.T.C. 63 a Bench held that rice bran is powdered rice. Bhusa and bhusi as understood in common parlance are commodities obtained from stalk, leaves and husk of rice. Rice bran cannot be treated as bhusi of rice. In this view, we answer the question referred to us by saying that rice bran cannot be placed in the category of bhusi. The question whether it will fall in any of the other categories mentioned in the notification may now be decided by the Judge (Revisions). The Commissioner will be entitled to costs, which are assessed at Rs. 100.