AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
1 paragraphs · 82 words1.
In so far as the appellant now claims possession of property to which she formerly claimed a declaration of title, we are of opinion that the suit is clearly not barred; she is seeking a different relief, and the relief she formerly sought was refused her in respect of this property, on the ground that the Court ought not to exercise its discretionary power of awarding a declaration of title when relief can be obtained by an ordinary suit for possession.