High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 11 J&K CK 0012

Darminder Singh And Others vs State Of J&K And Anr

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 3 November 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajnesh Oswal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Cases (CRMC) No. 342 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 456 words

Rajnesh Oswal, J

1.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under section 561-A Cr.P.C (now 482 Cr.P.C) for quashing the criminal proceedings in challan titled „State vs. Darminder Singh & others‟ pending before the court of learned Sub-Registrar, Judicial Magistrate, Jammu against the petitioners, arising out of FIR bearing No. 105/2014 for commission of offences under sections 498-A and 109 RPC.

2.

The present petition has been filed on the ground that the marriage between the petitioner No. 1 and the respondent No. 2 stands dissolved by virtue of judgment and decree dated 08.02.2018 passed by the court of Additional District Judge (Matrimonial Cases) Jammu, pursuant to the mutual divorce petition filed by the petitioner No. 1 and the respondent No. 2.

3.

Respondent No. 2 has filed the response in which factum of filing of mutual divorce petition as well as passing of judgment and decree has been admitted and further, it has been stated that the respondent No. 2 has no objection in the event, the present petition is decided in favour of the petitioners.

4.

Mr. Jamrodh Singh, GA submits that the appropriate order may be passed.

5.

A perusal of the record reveals that the marriage between the petitioner No. 1 and the respondent No. 2 stands dissolved by virtue of judgment and decree supra and once parties have settled their dispute amicably, the continuance of the proceedings under section 498-A/109 RPC shall be nothing but an abuse of process of law.

6.

Law is well settled that if the parties have settled their dispute amicably, then the criminal proceedings whether arising out of private complaint or out of FIR for commission of offences under sections 498-A RPC can be quashed notwithstanding the fact that the section 498-A RPC is non-compoundable. Reliance is placed upon a judgment of the Apex Court in case, titled, Jatinder Raghuvanshi and ors. v Babita Raghuvanshi and anr. reported in 2013 (4) SCC 58, in which it has been held that even if the offences are non compoundable, if they are relate to matrimonial disputes and the Court is satisfied that the parties have settled the dispute amicably and without any pressure, then section 320 of the Code would not be a bar to the exercising of power of quashing of FIR, complaint or the subsequent criminal proceedings.

7.

In view of the amicable settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No. 2, criminal proceedings in challan titled "State vs. Darminder Singh and others" pending before the court of learned Sub-Registrar, Judicial Magistrate, Jammu arising out of FIR bearing No. 105/2014 for commission of offences under section 498-A/109 RPC are quashed.

8.

The present petition is, accordingly, disposed of along with connected application.