AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 148 wordsIt was submitted by Mr. Bhishm Pratap Singh, Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondents that he shall be filing fresh Vakalatnama during the course of the day. It was further submitted on behalf of the Respondents that the matter has been settled between the parties.
The prayer was opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and it was submitted that talks regarding settlement were going on between the parties and as per the agreed terms of the settlement, certain payments were to be made by the Respondents and as per his instructions, it has not yet been done and, thus, a prayer that the matter be adjourned.
As prayed, let the matter be listed for "Directions" on 12th May, 2023. In case there is no actual settlement between the parties, the Respondents must file their evidence affidavits by the next date fixed in the matter.
