High CourtsSingle Bench

Darshan Hasmukhbhai Parmar vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 24 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 GUJ CK 0084

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.Y. Kogje, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 120(B), 406, 409, 467, 468, 471 · Prevention Of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 — Section 12, 13(1)(a), 13(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 20082 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

39 paragraphs · 691 words

A.Y. Kogje, J

1.

The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being I-CR

No.05 of 2020 registered with ACB Police Station, Jamnagar for offence under Sections 406, 409, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal

Code and Sections 12, 13(1)(a) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018.

2.

Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular

bail by imposing suitable conditions.

3.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

4.

Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order.

5.

I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:-

I. The FIR is registered on 20.11.2020 for the offence which is alleged to have taken place between 28.01.2016 to 20.01.2017.

II. The applicant is in jail since 25.11.2020.

III. The investigation is concluded and charge-sheet is filed.

IV. The applicant is a Government servant.

V. The co-accused Sarpanch and the Talati, who appeared to have receive financial benefits have already been enlarged by Co-ordinate Bench and

hence, by applying principle of parity.

VI. The applicant is not having any antecedents as per learned advocate for the applicant.

VII. Learned APP under instructions of IO is unable to bring on record any special circumstances against the applicant.

6.

This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of

Investigation, reported in [2012]1 SCC 40.

7.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing

the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8.

Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being I-CR No.05 of 2020

registered with ACB Police Station, Jamnagar, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like

amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief

with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not

change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

10.

The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the

above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

11.

Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or

relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

12.

At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while

enlarging the applicant on bail.

13.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.