High CourtsSingle Bench

Darshan Ram vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 12 January 2018 · Citation: (2018) 01 P&H CK 0031

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa.
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=3863>Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973</a>, <a href=3863-439>Section 439</a> - Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail · <a href=1767>Indian Penal Code, 1860</a>, <a href=1767-148>Section 148</a>, <a href=1767-149>S
CASE NUMBER
M-44688 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 328 words
1.

Prayer in the instant application is for adding section 188 I.P.C in the main bail petition preferred under section 439 Cr.P.C i.e. CRM-M-

44688-2017.

2.

In view of the averments made in the application and as per which it was at the stage of presentation of challan that the investigating agency had

added section 188 I.P.C to the other offences, prayer is allowed.

3.

The main petition filed under section 439 Cr.P.C would now be entertained and examined by adding section 188 I.P.C as well. Application is

disposed of.

Main Case

4.

Petitioner seeks the benefit of regular bail in case F.I.R. No.80 dated 25.8.2017 under sections 436, 427, 148, 149 I.P.C read with section 4

of the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984 and sections 3 and 4 of Explosive Substance Act, 1908, registered at Police Station,

Kot Dharmu, District Mansa. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard.

5.

FIR came to be registered on the statement of Baljit Singh in relation to an alleged occurrence dated 25.8.2017. Allegations are that about

17/18 persons arrived on motorcycles armed with Kirpans at the petrol pump proclaiming that their Guru of Sirsa had been wrongly convicted.

Further allegations are that petrol was poured on a diesel pump machine and was set afire. Damage to the diesel pump machine and other property

to the extent of Rs.2 lacs was caused.

6.

Petitioner was arrested on 28.8.2017. Investigation in the case is complete and even the challan has been presented. Learned State counsel

apprises the Court that the recovery effected from the petitioner is that of a stick. The trial is at the initial stage and would take time to conclude. In

the considered view of this Court, no useful purpose would be served by confining the petitioner in custody.

7.

Without making any observations on merits, present petition is allowed. Petitioner be enlarged on bail subject to satisfaction of Trial Court/Duty

Magistrate, Mansa. Petition disposed of.