High CourtsSingle Bench

Daya Ram vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 UK CK 0071

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 234 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 182 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the decision of committee dated 15.01.2018 whereby recommendation for re-

bidding has been made.

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the claim of Petitioner for award of work pursuant

to tender noticed dated 16.12.2017 considering the fact that Petitioner has qualified technical bid and is lowest bidder among the qualified bidders so

far as financial bid is concerned.

2.

This writ petition was filed in the year 2018 challenging the decision taken by a Committee, for inviting fresh bid.

3.

More than three years have gone by after filing of the writ petition. No interim order was passed in favour of the petitioner, therefore, the relief, as

claimed in the writ petition, cannot be granted at this belated stage.

4.

In such view of the matter, the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, does not survive. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.