High CourtsSingle Bench

Dayanand Mahto vs State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 13 April 2021 · Citation: (2021) 04 JH CK 0148

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 307, 323, 324, 341, 354, 504, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
CASE NUMBER
A.B.A. No. 1448 of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 481 words

Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the

stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.174

of 2020 registered under sections 323/ 324/341/307/354/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with

the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant -Usha Devi and Jyosana Devi. It is further submitted that the allegations against the

petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay Rs.20,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the informant

without prejudice to his defence in this case and undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes that he will not annoy

or disturb the informant or her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the

privilege of anticipatory bail.

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner

be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he

shall be released on bail on depositing a demand draft of Rs.20,000/- as ad interim victim compensation in favour of informant and on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate

-1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No.174 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation

of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card

in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that he will

not annoy or disturb the informant or her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under

section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

In case, the petitioner deposits the ad interim victim compensation amount, the court below is directed to issue notice to the informant and hand over

the said demand draft to her, after proper identification.