High CourtsDivision Bench

Debigir Tapdhari vs Emperor

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 22 December 1924 · Citation: AIR 1925 All 322

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mukerji, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 173
RESULT
Dismissed

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 152 words

Mukerji, J.—This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Bulandshahr with the recommendation that the conviction of one Debigir Tapdhari u/s 173 of the Indian Penal Code may be set aside and the fine inflicted may be remitted.

2.

It appears that a police constable took a summons to Debigir Tapdhari for the purpose of serving it on him. Debigir refused to take the summons and sign an acknowledgment. This is all that hag been proved in the case. The learned Magistrate thinks that this is enough to constitute an offence u/s 173 of the Indian Penal Code and the learned Sessions Judge thinks that something more is necessary than a refusal to accept a summons for a conviction under the said section. I agree with the learned Sessions Judge.

3.

I accept the reference, set aside the conviction and sentence and order that the tine, if paid, be refunded.